Moreland et al. v. Bongo’s Bar & Grill, LLC et al. (21-cv-10919); Sampedro et al. v. Fifth Alarm, Inc. et al. (21-cv-30066); Rosario et al. v. Fiesta Café LLC et al. (21-cv-30065); Sampedro et al. v. City Lounge, LLC et al. (21-cv-30064); Cerny et al. v. Costa Verde Corp. et al. (21-cv-10927); Ruiz v. Boston Leco Corp. et al. (21-cv-10923); Sampedro et al. v. P&M Corporation et al. (21-cv-10935); Sampedro et al. v. 240 Chestnut Street, Inc. et al. (21-cv-30067).

A number of different lawsuits were filed against a variety of Massachusetts bars, nightclubs and establishments, as well as their owners and operators, accusing them of violating Section 43 of the Lanham Act by misappropriating the images of the plaintiff models without permission to falsely suggest that the plaintiffs were associated with the establishments – in many instances, suggesting that the plaintiffs were appearing at the establishments as strippers.  According to the complaints, such acts constitute false and misleading representations of fact in commercial advertising and false or misleading use of a person’s image for commercial practices in violation of the Act.  The complaints further assert that this use of the images constitutes a violation of each plaintiff’s statutory and common law rights of privacy, defamation, conversion, and violation of c. 93A. 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: